|

'Outlaws of Yore (II)'
Various Artists
(ETHCD004)
|
|
'The
lăutari of Clejani are perhaps the most inspired and fervent of all
folk musicians in Romania. The exuberant, musical style of their
native southern region has certainly stimulated them in this
respect.'
|
|
|
Interview with SPERANŢA RĂDULESCU
of Ethophonie, Romania
|

SPERANŢA RĂDULESCU
|
There can
be few people better qualified to talk about Romanian folk music than
Speranţa Rădulescu. She is a Doctor
of Musicology, manages the Ethnophonie music label, and is currently Head
Researcher in the Ethnomusicology department of the Romanian Peasant's
Museum, Bucharest.
Since the 1960s she has studied music, particularly the true ethnic folk music of
her native Romania. Her research work in Ethnomusicology has included such
topics as dance music, the lyrical song, general peasant music typology, the lautari folk musicians and their status in the rural community, and Gypsy music. Over the years she has been involved in many folk music studies and activities; these
include research, recording, production, music concerts, publishing and seminars both abroad and in Romania.
July
2002
Ian Morrison (IM)
How
and when did Ethnophonie start?
Speranţa Rădulescu
(SR)
It
started exactly 11 years ago. At that time, I was preparing for a concert
with the musicians who later became famous as 'Haidouk ensemble'. The
concert was a huge success. My late director – a great painter and a
refined connoisseur in Romanian traditional music, Horia Bernea – asked me to put
their music on a cassette. In turn, I asked him for money. He didn’t
have any, all he could offer was 100 blank cassettes and some paper.
Helped by some friends and young colleagues, I produced a digital master
of the Haidouks music and made manual copies of it. The cassettes were
accompanied by a presentation paper, copied on an old xerox machine and
cut manually. I sold them in the Peasant Museum’s library, I took the
money received for them and I made some 200 more cassettes, with other
music and musicians. I chose the name 'Ethnophonie' for the series of
records, even if I wasn’t sure I would be able to produce the
second, the third, the fourth record.
It
wasn’t easy. Fortunately I had some experience in recordings, earned in
Romania (producing the 'Document' series of recordings, 1982-1984) and
abroad (Switzerland, France). Meanwhile, I produced a dozen CDs in France,
USA, and Germany and I organized concert tours with lots of Romanian
peasant musicians, in France, Switzerland, Germany, Belgium, Greece,
Italy, Spain, Hungary, Holland. But the Ethnophonie series could hardly be
kept running. In 1997, I gave up with it: I couldn’t carry on anymore
without any material help. However in 1999 I took
a Euroart grant, I selected a small and very serious team (three persons)
and I started afresh. Now, we are a well- known label in Romania. A small
one, but a good one.

(2) Etnophonie crew - Costin and Steliana
IM What
are the objectives of the label?
SR
What
are our objectives? To promote the genuine traditional music which still
exist in Romania.
As with every country under communist rule, Romania encouraged, during 50
years, the folklore – i.e. a music founded on the
tradition, but 'arranged' (i.e. debased) in order to satisfy the political
and esthetical requirements of the unique party, to present the Romanian
(to themselves and to foreigners) into a false, optimistic light.
Nowadays, I know (as do my permanent and devoted collaborators, Costin
Moisil and Steliana Mocanu) that nobody in Romania intends to produce a
single record containing genuine traditional music. We feel that it is our
duty. We know also that the general public in Romania is accustomed to
folkloric music and, for the moment, does not appreciate very much the
traditional one. But we are determined to keep producing it, because it is
necessary as a cultural testimony for the future; it
is also necessary to push/determine the Romanians to confront
themselves with their true image, not a false one.
We decided to record peasant, urban and religious traditional music from
all over the country and release them on cassettes and CDs. Romanian music, but
also the music of other ethnic groups, such as Hungarians, Jews,
Ukrainians, and Gypsies. We are looking for very good music, which is not
very easy to find. As a matter of fact, the Ethnophonie series is a
sonorous anthology of the traditional music in modern Romania. We are not
interested in very new, mixed up music, even if it is widespread in the
country. This music is promoted by all record companies and the media,
they do not need our 'help'. On the contrary, there is no media interested
in the peasant music – this is dying and really needs help.
IM How
do you decide on who and where to record?
SR
We
prefer:
-
very good music;
-
highly improvised music;
-
played
and/or sung by individuals and small groups of musicians (traditional
bands, i.e. taraf), if possible in the regular context of their
production (at countryside, at wedding parties, at the cradle, during the
religious service etc.)
-
different
kinds of music (ritual or non-ritual, belonging to different genres, from
different regions of the country and different ethnic groups);
-
music
on the verge of extinction.
We
avoid:
-
the
official stars of the Romania media;
-
the huge folklore ensembles ;
-
the
fine-art musicians casually playing folklore
-
the
studio recordings.
IM Can
you elaborate on what is termed the 'archaic' and 'rural' layers
in Romanian folk music? In particular perhaps where improvisation comes
into folk music?
SR
It
is difficult – if not impossible – to separate 'archaic' and
'new/modern' layers in music, because both
strata coexist in music, either in the concrete modern musical
pieces, or in the manner of playing/changing/improvising music.
Nevertheless, we have criteria helping us to establish if the 'archaic' or
'modern' style is predominant in one case or in another.
Yes, we clearly prefer the predominantly 'archaic' pieces: because we want
to preserve their dying traces; and also because usually they are fresher,
beautiful, spontaneous, sincere, more expressive and better balanced in
every respect.

(3) September 2001, during a concert in the the yard of Ioan Pop from Hoteni. From left to
right: Ioan Covaci (Ionu' lu' Grigore i.e. John son of Gregory) - fiddle; Ioan Pop - viola; Nicolae Pitis - flute
IM The
recordings of Emil Mihaiu and his band are somewhat unique as they give
two musical points of view, can you explain this? Do they bridge a gap
between Hungarians and Romanians?
SR
The
recordings of Emil Mihaiu’s band are really unique. But in the real life
of Transylvanian people, it happens quite often that popular musicians
play Romanian, Hungarian, Gypsy, sometimes even Jewish and German music,
in different circumstances, adopting each time the point of view of their
main beneficiary. Perhaps Emil and his band do that better that others,
because they are better musicians.
Do they bridge a gap?… Yes, of course. But, once again, they are not the
only ones.
On the other hand, don’t overlook the fact that for the first time the
music of two antagonistic ethnic groups are put together on the same
record. By chance, both – Romanian and Hungarian – are equally
beautiful, they are really extraordinary.
IM Is
it difficult for the musicians to obtain quality instruments and parts?
And if so does this hinder your recordings?
SR
Yes.
Almost all musicians have such problems. The brass bands musicians are
coping with the most difficult situations: the new wind instruments are
expensive, some of them quite rare (for instance clarinette in Es or
helocon/helicon),
the available ones are quite old. That’s why it is sometimes hard to
obtain a good tuning of a fanfare. The small tambal (cymbalum) has
become a rare instrument, the musicians have to fix it all the time, there
are no strings on sale, the musicians have to adapt guitar strings.
Recently we produced a very fine cassette: Old songs from Olt Valley.
The cymbalum player, a wonderful musician, had an awful antique
instrument, almost destroyed, with a harsh and unpleasant sound (see
picture 4). We
couldn’t help him in any way, so we recorded the music like it was,
because it was magnificent.

(4) Misu Langa and Constantin Enache (with 'antique cymbalum')
IM Certain
areas in Eastern Europe seem to have an abundance of folk music…what
are, in your opinion, the most important areas…villages…
personalities…?
SR
The
answer couldn’t be but ambiguous.
In our time, all traditional music is turning into newer music. But,
before becoming new, the old ones are degrading themselves. They are
losing parts, they are changing other parts of them. Their transitory
general aspect is uneven. For instance, in Wallachia, the old ballads have
almost disappeared, but the dance music and 'love songs' (a very
interesting musical genre) are still very strong, and able to produce new
pieces of a high artistic value. In Maramures county, most of the old
Christmas songs (colinde) are 'westernized', regular and unpersonal/uninteresting
songs, but the invartita dance melodies are still strong and able
to produce very imaginative improvisations. So, I can’t say that a
Romanian region preserves the traditional music better that another one;
but I can say, for instance, that the eastern part of Wallachia has lost
its ballads but preserved the old Christmas songs; western Wallachia has
also lost its ballads but preserved 'love songs' (an improvised, very
beautiful vocal-instrumental musical genre); Transylvania lost a good
part of its lyric, epic and ritual songs but preserved its splendid dance
melodies etc. The most interesting villages are, from my point of view,
those that I had the chance to discover. In this respect, my opinion
is subjective. As any subjective opinion, it could be a false one;
nevertheless, take into account that I traveled a lot, all over Romania,
and I listened to a lot of excellent music and popular musicians, so I
can’t be too wrong.

(5) Group Iza (Ioan Pop & Co.) in a recording session in Ioan Pop's
house. They can be heard on cassette C-017.
My favourite musicians are those I had the opportunity to work with. Emil
Mihaiu from Gherla (central Transylvania), Ioan Pop from Maramures county
(northern Transylvania), Misu Langa from Olt region (between Oltenia and
Wallachia), Costica Pantiru, brass band leader from central Moldavia, and
Costica Lupu from northern Moldavia… and, above all, the old-fashion
musicians from Clejani village (central Wallachia), who became famous as
the Taraf de Haidouk.
IM Are
these traditions real and alive in village life, as opposed to enthusiasts
keeping them alive?
SR
Yes,
they are still alive. Even if the traditional music is strongly challenged
by the new, creolised music, coming from all over the world, especially
from the Balkan area.
Keeping the traditional music alive? It is a question with many answers,
each one depending on the ideological trends.
The official culture still believes that the traditional music must be
kept alive in a folkloric form, i.e. 'arranged', domesticated, accompanied
by big orchestras, predictable, optimistic, directed by a chief musician
and so on. I think it is the wrong, false way to interpret and to use
Romanian traditional music. In my opinion, the traditional peasant music
should be helped to survive (at least for a while) by appreciating it, by
promoting it as it is, in its genuine form.

(6) Romanian Peasant Museum
IM Can
you tell us something about the Peasant Museum?
SR
Gladly.
It is an unconventional Romanian institution, trying to see the
traditional culture facts as they are, to understand what they meant, to
discover the way of thinking that produced them.
Being conceived by a great artist (the late Horia Bernea), it is mostly an
art museum. It does not intend to build a discourse about the traditional
culture, but to catch and to illustrate the spirit of it. First of all you
must enjoy visiting the museum. The objects in the exhibitions are not
accompanied by descriptions, as is usual; nevertheless, interested people
can find information about them in special corners, 'cabinet d’etude' ,
placed around. The museum shows the past, but also the present of the
peasant Romanian culture - as 'ugly', uneven and mixed as it is/it
became today.
The
most important quality of the museum and of the events taking place in it
is that they are all very BEAUTIFUL and TRUE.
Part two
this way>>
back to top |